Dan: 19-Oct-2009 08:41:46
Equation models the relationship between observer/actor/causer and 4-D reality. Once you answer how the actor does it with "three dimensions" that are not the the same as our 4-d dimensions; then you have the relationship eq. models. It is simple, just not obvious. Once we tie which one of the the "3-D actor Ds moves space time we have navigation with respect to the bowtie point in a Moebius universe.

Dan: 15-Oct-2009 12:55:00
Tightening up. Hits way up. Who will ask the first question?

Dan: 13-Oct-2009 06:25:14
Front page is getting there, much shorter. tada.

Dan: 03-Oct-2009 23:01:43
Took a week off from finishing final edits. Sure felt good, but if I am going to say we are short on time, I better start acting like we are.

Dan: 03-Oct-2009 22:59:44
Looks like the big crash in markets has started. The unemployment numbers are accelerating down, even though they are as usyal, lying through their teeth with the official numbers. The price of exempting anyone from liability is large, it becomes enormous when you exempt groups of people, called corporations from liability. We have (edited)ed all our savings down Coase's No Liability sinkhole.

Dan: 27-Sep-2009 07:10:41
Received an email from RedShift, said wanted to help. That is nice.

Dan: 23-Sep-2009 13:05:18
All I have to do is not push verification of Conj. and nothing will be done. No one will say, " you are not doing your duty to save everyone's life."; just me. I am becoming more curious about what is outside once we are ejected, or do we stay, I don't know. No one wants to look. Well I do, at least we will know if the conjunctions are there. It has to be a we, I can't do it myself, don't know how or have the means, it has to be some astronomers. Stick to your guns Dan, back to the editing.

Dan: 17-Sep-2009 08:18:00
figured out the coordinate system intrinsic to a Moebius with respect to the Bowtie point. Very simple in hindsight.

Dan: 17-Sep-2009 08:16:57
Making a conjunction on the axis plane and not also on the ecliptic plane at the same time is much easier.

Dan: 17-Sep-2009 08:16:03
+I should make clear, the conjunctions are on the vertical planes of the 9 & 12 o'clock axes. They do not need to be in conjunction on the plane of the ecliptic, just the axis plane at the right second.

Dan: 14-Sep-2009 08:39:13
Last detail on aiming point deduced. It is better than no window at all. 1/2400 of a second.

Dan: 10-Sep-2009 11:07:43
Both conjunctions must be "unnatural&qu ot; or we would claim coincidence. We need two because some of us are ignorant and self-serving = short-sighted.

Dan: 10-Sep-2009 07:41:25
My Redshift5 is giving inaccurate orbital info. Back to square one in verifying conjunctions. (edited).

Dan: 31-Aug-2009 21:00:49
Two discoveries on the same day, where the 2nd conjunction is, and why the circle sizes of the asteroids in the Missing Earth crop circle do not match the positions of the asteroids in the ME. The conjunction is exactly laid over the top of the 'vertical axis of our heliocentric astronomical co-ordinate system. That's when we turn into a pumpkin. Gorgeous, tick, tick, bang! With a center to center conjunction exactly on the axis line, we can get when A-M debt comes through to a micro-second. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx The second discovery is how they showed us both orbital radius and the size of each of the 65 asteroids in the ME. The circles representing the asteroids all lie on a circle = mean of their orbits; but actual asteroid orbital radii vary by up to hundreds of million kilometers from one another.xxxxxxxxxxx By dividing the actual diameter of each asteroids radius with what percentage its actual orbit is with respect to mean of the 65 orbit, you adjust size of circle representing asteroid up when asteroid is closer to Sun than mean, or down when it is outside the mean. Now that is slicker than snot. Equation to determine size of circle representing asteroid in Missing Earth is: Actual diameter in kilometers divided by(/}orbital radius percentage of mean; or Diameter/Percentage of Mean = how much adjust circle representing asteroid from one to one proportion. Two birds with one stone; actual orbital location radius and actual diameter with one circle for each asteroid.

Dan: 30-Aug-2009 04:20:28
No wonder I have been predicting a 2nd Conjuction, we could not know precisely when the WH is open.

Dan: 29-Aug-2009 08:59:46
Yes we do need the second conjunction, or another way to measure precisely when. Without it, we can not know when within the .000833 second the wormhole window is open. It a practical necessity unless we want to guess, I don't. We must know when within a microsecond. We do not have the conclusion until the E-Ts show us exactly when. The E-Ts told us what was going to happen and 'how long until' with the Barbary Castle crop circle on July 17, 1991 at about 1:45 AM GMT. They showed us an example of what was going to happen to us with the Shoemaker-Levy comet on July 16, 1998 at 20:13 GMT, exactly 3 sidereal Earth years later(leap year) and then explained the consequences of this Sun explosion with the Missing Earth crop circle which has four July 16ths in it; but the E-Ts have not shown us their conclusion, exactly when to a micro-second. It can only be shown with the 2nd conjunction = they have moved two asteroids to accomplish that = can not be natural = prove to the slow among us that we are being contacted publicly by E-Ts with a very precise warning message, and make our margin of error for the shot we have to make, smaller than the hole we have to hit.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (8-29-09 at about 15:00 PST) That would sure make it easy. The only problem with my assumption above that the E-Ts will show us precisely when, is that we can do this for ourselves by timing the 'jump' of one or both of the July 16, 2110 and 2011 Fixed Ray of our Planetary Spirit. Since the 2nd Conjunction is not necessary for proof of the message, then no 2nd C would mean we have the technology needed in our possession to do the above measurements. That would mean no time to dally. Two working interplanetary 'blinkships' would sure be nice.

Dan: 28-Aug-2009 02:39:51
Now that I have pared the E-T message to its essentials, I don't want to proceed, I want to reflect a bit, pare my words to only the essential.

Dan: 28-Aug-2009 02:37:37
"Smart people learn from their mistakes, while wise people learn from the mistakes of others." My problem is I had no others. A necessary part of being first; but some mistakes are common to all endevours, like ignoring discrepancies.

Dan: 26-Aug-2009 08:44:59
We don't need the 2nd conjunction, it was logically already there = Left hand horizontal axis of "our arbitrarily selected co-or.system". The E-Ts summation part of their warning was to tie it into our logical astronomical description system. A 2nd conjunction is redundant; and if there is one thing our warning message is not, is redundant in any part. The odds of a conjunction falling on the exact 15 sidereal year anniversary of the Shoemaker=Levy comet to the second are enormous between any pair of the 65 asteroids shown in the Missing Earth crop circle on any vector. Add the requirement that the July 16, 2009 conjunction exactly overlay the Left Axis of Our coor system is not possible naturally. Their warning is so beautifully designed, nice IQ test, now are we honest enough to accept it? Can I explain it well enough?

Dan: 25-Aug-2009 05:38:38
"Ptolemy himself, in his Almagest, points out that any model for describing the motions of the planets is merely a mathematical device, and, since there is no actual way to know which is true, the simplest model that gets the right numbers should be used;..." Wikipedia, art. on Heliocentrism. The point is a conjunction on the left horizontal axis of our "paticular selection of axis location' is not chance.

Dan: 23-Aug-2009 09:43:21
Debugging Q&A at last.

Dan: 23-Aug-2009 09:43:01
Removed this from front page. A future topic. "An objective reality is, by definition, a consensual reality. When witnesses are kept honest by Public Challenges they create truthful 'objective'; information for everyone."

Dan: 20-Aug-2009 04:12:01
On what vector from Sun are the Conjunctions? The "Missing Earth" gives the clue by showing us using our point of view through by using our coordinate system; the Left Horizontal Axis of my planetarium program. I believe the North Heliocentric view is looking down from Earth's North at the Greenwich meridian.

Dan: 19-Aug-2009 20:41:57
The E-Ts would have to modify orbits of asteroids to make them match. Ergo, I thought it possible they would have overlapping conjunctions point at Jupiter, but there is nothing close at the time Shoemaker-Levy hit. Hence, the vector chosen is the one where there are two pairs that are closest to overlapping, hence needing least modification. Thus we can see that their orbits have been modified form old orbits. As unmistakable as pointing the overlapped conjunctions at Jupiter's position on July 16, 1994.

Dan: 19-Aug-2009 04:56:59
Caught a two minute error in 2012 time. Reehecked impact time 20:13 not 20:15.