Dan: 16-Aug-2009 03:39:02
The top two purposes of the N1CL are for anyone to give free "objective" reports to all, and to SELL Goods & Services(G&S) to the rest of us, subject to Challenge by Questions From Anyone. For example, I am selling, "Running a conservation debt disconnection." to the governments and people of planet Earth. It will be a N1CL contract. My terms below.

Dan: 15-Aug-2009 01:40:56
After shortening and editing on 11th, I have not wanted to do anything. Before I could always stop, my choice; but now I suspect I will soon be hanging onto the tail of the tiger.

Dan: 12-Aug-2009 03:16:20
I am having a ball playing with the colors.

Dan: 12-Aug-2009 03:08:02
Any "No 1st Cost" based civilization of equals must have a single central place where everyone can meet to resolve their Public differences.

Dan: 11-Aug-2009 08:24:18
Neither real science, nor a civilization of equals can exist without scientists and leaders agreeing to answer Public Challenges from anyone.

Dan: 08-Aug-2009 23:44:26
Finally settled on a headline, "Why & How E-Ts Are Giving Earth A PUBLIC Warning". My salesman father taught me, "Sum up the essence of what you are selling in a headline, and your 'sales pitch' flows logically and your sale is easy.". Also, what your selling has to make your 'prospect; better off = save them time, make them money, ease their life, or don't sell to them.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I'd say most of you probably don't want earth to go away on July 16, 2012. In fact, I would bet well over 95% of you would agree with that statement.

Dan: 04-Aug-2009 10:29:43
Every part of our "Warning" ; has been in public, for all or any of us to see. There are five parts, the two crop circles, and three actions Shoemaker-Levy and the two conjunctions. Every part is linked by the Earth sidereal year anniversay date of July 16th or 17th because of our leap year. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx thus in public we must answer, which means not through our present structurally corrupt leadership. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx PUBLIC = everyone agrees that we have been warned by E-Ts of what will happen on July 16, 2012, unless we act together to prevent it.

Dan: 29-Jul-2009 02:33:59
Answer to question raised in 2nd MT below. "....each implies a difference that matters.". implies "With respect to what common measure?": Since our two choices are opposite ends of a common measure; ergo, 'either/or choice'. = go/no go = Exactly When. = Where. Ergo, which side of Worm Hole opening we use matters. The E-Ts have told us which side! Thank You.

Dan: 29-Jul-2009 02:23:45
No confirmation back yet from Betty Iorg at "The Astronomical League". We talked for around 30 minutes yesterday, and she agreed to verify conjunctions asap. Sent email with ME link and phone number. I was expecting a delay should the prediction be true. I know how it feels to recognize what the E-Ts are describing.

Dan: 29-Jul-2009 02:15:23
There are two possible 'at the absolute margin' conjunction overlaps: xxxx First, center to center both at full eclipse; xxxx Second, 2012 full eclipse C is centered on center of partial eclipse line of 1st C. Either implies a difference that matters. What are these differences?

Dan: 28-Jul-2009 03:31:49
Edison had over 4500 whacks at building a working light bulb, I doubt I get as many. Notice I say wrong, not mistaken predictions. Mistaken implies you already know the answer. A scientist is trying to figure out the answer, and so uses a method that reveals how much his theoretical predictions differ from reality. Ergo, if you can not show them wrong = falsify them, it ain't science. However getting to the point of making real falsifiable predictions is all imagination, fantasizing, playing, jiggling around, breaking things, making things happen, guessing until you see a line of explanation. That is what Edison did and so do I. At the end you hunch the conclusion and Joila!, discovery happens after a lot of thought and work. Persistence always wins in the end.

Dan: 28-Jul-2009 02:29:22
To have a actual civil society of equals, imposition of real accountability for leaders must begin asap. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx Regarding the E-Ts, I suspect their societies already know this is how you run an honest democratic government, and they know we have to figure this out for ourselves. Another question to ask of them.

Dan: 28-Jul-2009 02:16:36
Independent verification of two conjunctions underway.

Dan: 25-Jul-2009 19:50:03
I changed prediction from 2nd C centered over July 16, 2009 overlap line TO centered over 'full eclipse' of first conjunction. That would be much more exact as atronomers can measure center to center of Full Eclipses much more precisely. We need this tacked down to a microsecond.

Dan: 25-Jul-2009 00:12:41
Have calls in to Minor Planet Center at Harvard. Roger Sudbury at MIT referred me.

Dan: 21-Jul-2009 02:01:49
Will send this email to asteonomers:xxxxxxx xx A request to confirm two Asteroid Conjunctions, both occurring on the 15 and 18 year Earth sidereal year anniversary date of the first piece(A) of Shoemaker-Levy striking Jupiter. Both pairs of Asteroids will be from the 65 largest. We have confirmed both conjunctions to within the margin of errof of RedShift's pointer. The first conjunction occurred on July 16, 2009 at about 16:42 UT, the second at about 10:59 UT July 16, 2012. Both will probably be from among the largest 50 asteroids as the 2009 C is. Since the first just occurred on July 16, 2009 at about 16:42 09 UT, we can really refine the time down to well less than a second with some want to. The Shoemaker-Levy impact time has a margin of error of about plus/minus 5 minutes. I can show you the exact vector from the Sun and will attach the link to that picture. The second will occur on the same vector exactly three sidereal years later, July 16, 2012 at 10:59 35.56 UT. The full eclipse point of the second conjunction will be exactly centered on the partial eclipse line of the first conjunction(1/2 to 6/7th) to the microsecond. You can confirm this by refining your observations of the second conjunction's two asteroids orbits. Using a heliocentric view locking on Sun with Earth to your left, the July 16, 2009 conjunction is just above the horizontal coordinate line with Sun as origin. I do not have to tell you what the probability of two Earth year sidereal anniversary overlapping conjunctions is. I am describing a zero probability natural event. What a neat falsifiable prediction. I will explain why I was able to make this prediction when you call. You will be able to get the exact times of these conjunctions a lot closer quickly, and we do need quick. Please independently verify these two conjunctions ASAP. This is very literally a matter of life and death. Dan Alter, a scientist who answers questions in public from anyone about my public assertions.

Dan: 20-Jul-2009 22:51:36
I have discovered some really neat stuff in the last few weeks. FTL here we come. I know how to do it in theory and what it takes to build and navigate a FTL ship. Private investors, not government, may inquire.

Dan: 19-Jul-2009 10:07:29
There are two possible conjunctions at exactly the same vector from the Sun on July 16, 2009 and July 16, 2012, as close as I could tell with Redshift5's pointer. The angle past Earth is the same as seen in the ME circle. It is the last prediction that confirms a theory, built on all the wrong ones you used to get there. Merde!

Dan: 19-Jul-2009 08:57:08
The E-Ts have shown us two Start symbols, the one spoke circle in the Barbary Castle and the first conjunction in Missing Earth. Ergo a circle with one continuous line inside straight or curved, does not need to touch circumference twice. Two symbols after the one spoke, maybe two touch circumference or more means next to last.

Dan: 19-Jul-2009 08:51:57
The syntax used by E-Ts in crop circles is becoming clearer. The seen and the unseen. They only show what they must as the rest is implied. We need a linguist and symbol set solver. What are the rules of the set?

Dan: 19-Jul-2009 08:48:13
The "Third Warning". Premise: When you can cause one conjunction of two asteroids, you can cause another. Ergo, a second conjunction which is a Full Eclipse, dead center = the exact micro second. The first conjunction had to be half eclipse in order to see it, the start of your last unit of time = three years.

Dan: 19-Jul-2009 08:43:39
We did get our "Third Warning", it has been there all along. What a gorgeous elegant warning ritual. It is also an IQ test to see which planetary civilizations are smart enough to figure out the ritual.

Dan: 18-Jul-2009 18:53:15
The 2012 July 16 conjunction should be as close to the vector from the Sun location of the July 16, 2009 conjunction as to make no never mind. They induced a mistaken prediction. Three years feels like an eternity now. It is not, we have a lot to do.

Dan: 17-Jul-2009 19:32:37
My Redshift5 shows a conjunction of Aneas & Myrrha asteroids on July 16, 2012 at 10:59:35 AM UT. The margin of error of my pointer width is 100,000 kilometers of orbital circumference at least. Need to check with astronomers. May be at least one other possibility.

Dan: 17-Jul-2009 07:09:21
Thank God for wrong predictions. We are so lucky I was fooled. The E-Ts did lie, in a sense, but it was needed to show the syntax of their hieroglyphs and convince us of the real date. They are using base 7 = 6 spokes in a circle when you can not use actual positional notation with the circle being the zero combined with a integer symbol beside it. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxA PREDICTION follows::::: They fooled me into concluding 6 units of time = 18 years when they used the conjunction of two Asteroids on July 16, 2009, exactly to the minute 15 sidereal years after the first piece of the Shoemaker-Levy comet struck Jupiter. How elegant, how conclusive for me. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Ergo,if they really mean 7 units of time = 7x3 Earth sidereal years = 21 years = July 16, 2012; then there must be another conjunction of two asteroids on July 16, 2012, a leap year, three sidereal years to the second after the first July 16, 2009 asteroid conjunction. xxxxxxxxxxx I don't have to point out the utter impossibility of that happening by coincidence. Neato, I have not looked yet, out comes my RedShift 5.