Dan: 23-Dec-2009 00:15:15
Posted "Which two asteroids are shown in conjunction in 'Missing Earth" to space.com in Ask the Astronomer forum.

Dan: 20-Dec-2009 07:52:08
I figured out what the E-Ts want from us to help us. It is, of course the last thing our leaders will want to do. Doing it stops the "Great Game" our Three Monkey Society leaders are playing with we little people and it surely prevents any future leaders from attacking another planet. Unless we do figure this out for ourselves and do it, no help, and we fry. Necessity demands the E-Ts act this way. We would do the exact same thing in their shoes.

Dan: 15-Dec-2009 09:15:30
This has always been about crime; what is it, how do we minimize it?

Dizfunkshunal: 12-Dec-2009 20:10:28
You still alive?

Dan: 10-Dec-2009 05:44:02
The "How To find two asteroids..." is getting better. I pray for the 2009 conjunction.

Dan: 09-Dec-2009 03:35:29
The more I think about it, the more likely the conjunction occurred on July 16, 2012. This means no second conjunction and that is more consistent with the E-Ts behavior, which is to leave the soon to be dead one in the bed at the far end of the ward and say as little as possible to them. No second conjunction = no precise when = we have to do another kind of measurement asap. Will know whether 2009 or 2012 within a day or two. The rest of you keep letting me find my own wrong predictions. I guess that is a Thank God.

Dan: 08-Dec-2009 12:03:52
Consider all the possibilities. That's what Einstein did not do, in fact he explicitly rejected the set of possibilities I am using to expand Relativity. Methinks my desire for a second conjunction blinded me to the possibility that the conjunction is for 2012. We will soon know. That will change things. We need interplanetary FTL for sure fast and we need to measure FR fast by 2010 July 16, 2010 jump. we have to tack down when within 1/2400th of a second.

Dan: 07-Dec-2009 08:58:36
All you people who knowingly tolerate people " ...who knowingly give untruthful public information." . Not very bright. By definition you cannot be a real scientist, or honest citizen.

Dan: 06-Dec-2009 11:15:02
Final title: "Which two asteroids does the Longwood-Warren, aka the "Missing Earth" crop circle show in conjunction?" . When it is an exact to scale replica of the parts of the solar system it shows., it is easy.

Dan: 01-Dec-2009 10:20:55
Figured out how to measure actual diameter of asteroids from size circle for asteroids shown in Missing earth circle. E-Ts had to have multiplied actual diameter of asteroids by some constant factor for us to see them in ME, probably about 10,000 or 2^13 to one km of diameter.

Dan: 30-Nov-2009 15:11:50
I think the second conjunction is at 6 o'clock, not 12. The BC circle turned clockwise, the ME counterclockwise. We are in the last three years of a unit of three years. so when you do a "head to toe mirror" of ME; then you still see conjunction at 9 o'clock but the 6 becomes a 12 0'clock and times arrow goes clockwise, in three 1 year jumps = last three year unit, instead of 9 which equals 3 of the E-T time units.

Dan: 28-Nov-2009 00:49:13
The "Which two asteroids in conjunction in Longwood-Warren"; article should be done by Sunday. I will follow my own directions to show them th emean of the 65 asteroids orbit.

Dan: 25-Nov-2009 01:22:50
Finishing up "Which two asteroids are used for conjunction shown in Longwood-Warren&qu ot; article, maybe a topic. Must post to space.com asap. Probably another 3-4 hours of work.

Dan: 20-Nov-2009 10:29:12
I am starting Preliminary Patent App for FTL. I must talk about how in public.

Dan: 16-Nov-2009 10:11:12
Space.com forums have been very useful. They are most unused to someone using their handles((no real names, afraid?) and quoting them when answering. The only real way to teach how to do science is by example.

Dan: 12-Nov-2009 10:40:42
A rise in the dollar will cause massive short covering as we have a 97% bearish reading on dollar. market collapses and a specific sequence of large in quick succession price changes will occur.

Dan: 08-Nov-2009 19:48:33
Aha, we have FTL. I woke up from a dream and realized how. Einstein's "missed implication" was that he did not recognize that his train example showed us "how to measure how fast we are going with respect to the speed of light". I deduced that dropping down to zero c meant we would drop down between two sides Moebius universe surface. We see E-T ships blink in and out of sight, jumping a distance between disappearance/reappearances. So the question is: How do E-Ts drop to zero c almost instantly?? I know the answer and it is patentable.

Dan: 08-Nov-2009 00:40:25
Should I write "Proof that Bush did 9-11"? Is it a distraction or a necessity? Our conservation debt is about accountability, and until we hold our leaders accountable in public, we will not cooperate to do a disconnection. We can not be fighting wars while preparing for a disconnection. No fighting between ourselves while facing a common danger. We are spirits = this is a spiritual = ethical problem. Our collective focused intent is needed. I can point out where the wormhole opening is and the moment to do the drop through it; but hitting that 'instant'; requires prayerful focus by the vast majority to work. We all share in our survival or die in disunity.

Dan: 06-Nov-2009 07:46:55
Once I rewrite a new Einstein article, I have to send the "verify conjunctions" out to astronomers. I hate the thought, it would be so nice to be wrong.

Dan: 04-Nov-2009 07:03:39
A nice rest, figured out where and why Einstein wrong. By inspection, the speed of light is our base frame of reference as it is a constant with respect to all observers, and Einstein with his own train example, the "Missed Implication" showed us how to measure our speed with respect to c.

Dan: 26-Oct-2009 20:25:00
Hits are way up. Seem to be cataloging bots.Nothing on pictures. Must start bugging astronomers next week.

Dan: 24-Oct-2009 08:30:22
The third postulate: derived from "Einstein's Missed Implication". It is required to give relativity its base reference frame.

Dan: 23-Oct-2009 10:33:08
Einstein had two postulates he rested his analysis on: c is a constant with respect to all observers; and the laws of physics stay the same in all non accelerated frames of reference. The third postulate gives us our basic frame of reference. At zero c, we drop between between two sides Moebius surface. Ergo, we sit at the boundary between where light has reached us from elsewhere/and not reached us yer. Thus we only go between two sides to where light has not reached us yet.

Dan: 20-Oct-2009 03:29:38
Eq theorem: There is a unigue non-intersecting shortest line between any two non exact opposite, not more than 90 degrees rotatioin away, opposite side pairpoints on a Moebius.

Dan: 20-Oct-2009 03:23:27
Eq marches to a 3/4 beat. How we use the unmoved mover/keeps everything separated, i.e. zero is the key, open close, stop start, its the taking turns. What takes turns?, = stop start.